10. You only take pictures
of your cat, cub scout, and the deer in your back yard and post them to Flickr.
9. You always shoot
in “P” mode and think P stands for Professional.
8. You got an extra
big tax refund this year, so why not?
7. You never make a
print bigger than 8x10.
6. You don’t own a
tripod. If you do own one, it weighs 1
pound and has skinny aluminum legs and cost $29.95.
5. You post every shot you take. You do not sort out "treasures from trash" because it takes too much time and you think all of them are great, anyhow.
4. You don’t spend
time cropping photos and then printing the crops to 16x20. Where would you hang big prints anyway?
3. You think Moire
and Moira are twins, and you dated one of them in high school.
2. You advertise your
professional photographer services on Facebook and Craigslist. You expect the camera to pay for itself in 6
months, just because it is so cool.
1.
You know that more megapixels always means
better pictures.
OK, so here’s the serious point. If you do not take commercial, architectural,
landscape or wildlife pictures at a professional level, you do not need a 36
megapixel camera. This camera is for
large prints with immaculate detail. It
is for making large prints from tight crops.
It is not for shooting little league games. There is absolutely no point in buying a Ferrari to pick up dog food at the feed&seed. It will do the job, but what a waste!
What most folks do not realize is that to get the most from
this camera you will need to call consistently on the very best technique you
have. Camera shake, for instance, is
fatal to large prints. The fundamental sharpness of the
image, especially when made into prints from deep crops or very large prints,
will make unintended motion blur stand out like a pimple on a supermodel.
To avoid camera shake, you will need to shoot at high
shutter speeds, even in crappy light, or you will need to take the time to use
a REALLY GOOD tripod and ball head, using a remote trigger and mirror pre-up. The lower the light level, the more these
precautions become necessary. For snapshots, no problem. For 8x10, probably no problem but for 40x60, big problem.
Here is an example, shot with a Mamiya 645 AFD with a 22.5 megapixel digital back. Tripod mount, mediocre ballhead on an Induro 313 (good) tripod.
The image looks fine at up to 11x14, but after that it starts to crumble. And at a full crop, you can see how badly motion blur louses things up.
You will also need extraordinary lenses. That’s because edge distortion, vignetting,
and color fringing are a real problem with the camera design – not Nikon’s
fault, just a matter of some nasty laws of physics. So get used to names like Zeiss, and prepare
to spend a fortune if you want to get the best results.
The short version of all this is that while this beast looks
like a 35 millimeter camera, it needs to be treated as if it were a medium
format camera (645 or larger). If you shoot medium format, you're used to the care needed for gallery-quality large prints. If not, there's a learning curve ahead of you.
To get the most from big-sensor cameras, or from this one, you
will need the very best supporting gear and lenses, a fair amount of patience,
and a lot of technical skill.
Lacking those attributes, and having some regard for money,
the D800 is a waste of your money. Get a
D7000 – it’s all you’ll ever need.
Finally, I figure the odds of anybody actually listening to
this advice are a zillion to one, because, let’s face it, the D800 and D800e
are flat-out amazing machines.



Does distortion and vignetting increase with more pixels?? I didn't think so...
ReplyDeleteIt's not the pixels that drive distortion. It's what goes on with lenses; if they are distortion-prone to any noticeable degree, the effect will be magnified. Remember, you want this camera to get the very best images you can, usually to make large prints. I understand, but cannot explain the reasons, that the sensor size (not pixel count) has something to do with this. I believe it's something to do with the light path from lens to sensor that magnifies distortion problems.
DeleteI totally agree. It's an amazing instrument, but not for everyone.
ReplyDeleteContext: Shooting 35mm and better for 40 years, almost a decade doing commercial/industrial photography with every format up to and including 8x10 sheet film. Currently shooting mostly digital video, but lots of stills as well.
LMAO...It's about time someone pointed out the obvious. Kind of annoying to have to wait for months while uncle bob gets his D800 so he can take little league photos with it, while many professionals that didn't immediately pre-roder the next/best thing but instead decided to wait and do their research now have to wait at the back of the line...
ReplyDeleteI've already seen the posts on the amateur forums with people complaining about focus issues on the D800...
ugh..
get a clue.
Interesting observations, some I hadn't considered. The space images would take on your hard drive is enough to make it scary to begin with.
ReplyDeleteSorry, I'm an amateur (in the sense that I love my photography), but I have no regrets that I got my D800E before your "hard-working professionals" did. I have only shot about 3500 images with it in the month I have had it, and I'm only using the 85/1.4G with it (not Zeiss, because my eyesight doesn't allow me to use manual focus).
ReplyDeleteIt's quite simply the best body I've used (I have owned a Leica M9, but my previous main body was a 1Ds Mark III). You can have it when you pry it from my cold dead hands :)
BTW: one way to avoid the need to use a tripod is to shoot in the studio. Oh, and there's no moire when you are shooting art nudes...
What is wrong with "I want one"? I have a Gibson Les Paul Guitar. For my ability I can't use what's available on the cheapest Korean copy guitar but I love that Les Paul and I take great pleasure from owning it. Yes some people have to have the latest stuff just because its new (mainly Apple owners) but for a lot of us its love. The only reason i'm waiting on the D800 is I feel there will be a more refined version to clean up some of the niggles in the emdium term. But that will be my camera for the next 10 years. (think D3S).
ReplyDeleteAs for disk space - disk is about 10 cents a GB where I live. A 2TB disk is $200 . If you cant afford that you cant aford a D800.
You should anticipate 50 MB files. That's a big file on most computers. You will find that your pictures will choke your computer and workflow. If you are not comfortable with compressing images, people will be annoyed when you send them pictures as the files will be too large.
ReplyDeleteA Les Paul sounds different, so I can understand the inclination to get one of those. Before you can take advantage of the dynamic range a D800 has to offer, you will be spending years learning about exposure, ISO, Diffraction, DOF, ect.
I am not confident that you will be producing mural images (perhaps ever) or investing in Super Glass to take advantage of the D800 sensor. Again, the D700 is a great camera for everyday use. Quit acting "nouveau riche". Get a camera that matches your needs and not your ego.
MY first DSLR was the D100 and then the D200. I don't need the resolution of the D800 but I enjoy the hobby. I chose the camera because I enjoy outdoor nature photography and cropping on a D200 left me looking at pixels by the time I could see the bird in the bush. I bought the 70-200 f2.3 VRII lens and it made quite an impact on the quality of images of the D200 could produce. Now I look forward to learning and exploring what I can do with the D800 - even though I may never print anything greater tan 8x10. Bottom line, its my money and if I choose to invest it in something that I enjoy why should you try to make me feel guilty or foolish for doing so.
ReplyDeleteIt is your money. You can spend it where you like-- be clear, you're not investing it because you have no hope of return from it. Not monetary, not artistic, not anything. On the other hand, it's just possible you might rise to the challenge of the camera and up your game so you ARE getting the most out of it. If your attitude is "what a great tool to help me learn" I say go to it and have a great time. Just don't expect the camera to do your work for you -- it won't.
ReplyDelete